obstinance: (098)
ᴄʟᴀʀʏ ғ̶ʀ̶ᴀ̶ʏ̶ ғᴀɪʀᴄʜɪʟᴅ ᴍᴏʀɢᴇɴsᴛᴇʀɴ ([personal profile] obstinance) wrote in [community profile] nysalogs 2017-10-19 04:54 am (UTC)

Technically? It is.

[ they aren't discussing semantics, despite that, though that isn't the only reason she bites back an argument. it would be pointless, a waste of time, in the grand scheme of things. ]

If it comes to that, I'll have to try.

[ she isn't going to lie, even if it isn't what either of them want to hear. it might not be a guarantee, but that hasn't stopped her before. ]

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of nysalogs.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting